Tele: (513)541-0252
soapboxbooks@riseup.net

1415 Knowlton Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45223

Open: Mon, Thurs, and Saturday 4pm ~ 8pm

Ryan Messer Blinded by class interests

Ryan Messer, president of the Over-the-Rhine community council, recently wrote of the need for a party that represents “urban interests.” Such a party, he says, would be fiscally responsible but socially progressive. Messer, who recently married his partner in Washington Park and lives in the highly gentrified area south of Liberty Street, laments the fact that neither the Republican or Democratic party matches the interests of the “urbanists” in the city. Without a shred of irony, Messer describes the process that the basin has undergone over the last decade or so:

In the past, the urban core of a city was predominately [sic] poor and Democratic, but that’s changing as people nationally and locally are moving back to the inner city, driving up property values. Those who are willing to pay a half million dollars or more for a condo tend to lean fiscally right yet embrace such socially progressive issues as urban renewal, transit and same sex marriage. For which party should they vote? The answer, it seems, is neither.

8f36b882638911e3907e121b5d90bda3_8He paints the transformation of Over-the-Rhine and the surrounding area as being of a natural origin, and that the new richer residents are moving in as a result of–not a constituent part of–that process. This description is tone-deaf to actual forces at play in more ways than one. His narrative is completely self-serving, Messer is a property owner and he has flaunted his class interests in the past. During the debate around the streetcar, Messer, a leader in the “Believe in Cincinnati” movement, made issue of the fact that his family’s financial interests were tied to the continuation of the project. He went so far as to threaten a lawsuit in order to “protect” his family’s investments along the proposed route. And in this latest opinion piece he ties Obama winning re-election in 2012 to his and his husband’s ability to file taxes jointly in 2014 (seeming to make the cause of gay marriage out to be over an economic relation, but that’s another discussion).

These show two great disconnects with reality. First, Messer ignores the fact that the majority of the non-voting electorate are the people he identifies as the traditional population of the urban core–”poor and Democratic.” Blacks make up about a quarter of Cincinnati’s population, and about three quarters in OTR. This population has faced obstacles to actually being able to vote that harken back to the Jim Crow Era. Black men, disproportionately targeted by the racist and corrupt criminal justice system, the “New Jim Crow,” face high levels of disenfranchisement based on criminal histories, along with a slew of other setbacks coming out of prison that affect their ability to find housing, education and employment.

Even so, in the last presidential election Historic Black turnouts were a key indicator early on of an Obama victory. However, in the area of OTR north of Liberty, which still has largely black streets and is relatively untouched by the gentrification in the neighborhood’s southern half, voter turnout in the last presidential election was lower than black turnout overall (about 40% of registered voters in the precinct turning out, with 66% black turnout nationwide). But Messer’s focus is a different population, a wealthier, more conservative group, which have not been historically apathetic or disenfranchised in the political system in America. On the contrary, this group is representative of policy makers, now and historically.

The second disconnect is Messer’s blindness to the economic interests of the majority of the residents of Over-the-Rhine. For Messer, who shares the viewpoint of many gentry, this population, utilizing social services and living in affordable housing and working low paying jobs and paying low or no taxes, represent more of a passive group to be dictated to than one to be activated for their own shared interests (which are counterposed to his).  Messer is in favor of protections for those of a minority race, gender and sexual orientation–good things–but he does not mention having similar protections for the class of people who are economically disadvantaged which the capitalist system requires as part of its base structure. And this unspoken part is very important, because what he doesn’t say is that the economic protections that do exist are for a specific economic class: his own. Messer’s financial interests rely on the continued displacement of this economically disadvantaged population, which is the policy in OTR. Property owners receive tax breaks and capital funds unavailable to residents. This is true no matter how many times he or people like him tout OTR’s “economic diversity.” Urban renewal, or “renaissance” as Messer calls it, always comes on the back of the lowest class of people. And Cincinnati’s poor, especially its poor blacks, are no exception, having been cleared out of Bucktown and Kenyan-Barr and now OTR over the course of the city’s history.

Putting those things aside for a moment, Messer seems completely devoid of any idea of what actual “urban” people want. An often circulated Pew poll from 2011 reported that youth voters favor socialism to capitalism by a slim margin (49 percent compared to 43 percent). The poll also showed very high acceptance of the idea of socialism among blacks at 66 percent. Taken as an indication of crude economic interests, this poll points to the opposite of what Messer sees: that a growing number of people favor an end to the capitalist economic system and its (disingenuous) espousal of fiscal responsibility. This dovetails with a more recent Gallup poll which showed 60% of the American population wants a new party.

Messer’s desire for a “government that’s fiscally responsible and helps those who are disadvantaged and protects everyone regardless of race, gender or sexual orientation” is a stark neoliberal vision of society that separates out economic and social policy to better control the both areas. Neoliberal capitalism, like capitalism in all forms, divides the working class along the same lines he describes (and countless others) so that business and property owners can reap the profits and exert control over the economic system at international, national, municipal, neighborhood and household levels. Such a system could never truly protect all its citizens.

Additionally, what Messer doesn’t see it that his dream party actually exists as the Charter Party in Cincinnati, which, though weakening recently, has for nearly 100 years been a somewhat electable third party alternative. It has a relatively fluid platform, but today is representative of Messer’s interests, having been led by richer, more liberal (in the classical sense) city dwellers like Jim Tarbell, Roxanne Qualls and Chris Bortz in recent years.

But really, Messer should be right at home in the Democratic Party, to which he was elected as a precinct executive. The Democrats actually have led the way in many of the more aggressive measures that would fall under the umbrella of “fiscal responsibility” both locally and nationally. Bill Clinton spearheaded historic measures for welfare reform, continuing the trend of demonization and scapegoating of the poor that was pushed by the grandfather of neoliberal policy in the United States, Ronald Reagan, back in the 1980’s. This kind of dismantling of the social safety net is central to policy around “fiscal responsibility.” Today Democrats even tout the fact that Obama’s fiscal policy more closely resembles that of Reagan than historic Democratic presidents like FDR or JFK, as if that’s some kind of virtue. Obama himself made it a point to mention repeatedly during his bid for reelection that his and Republican opponent Mitt Romney’s ideas around what to do about Social Security were more similar than different. Far from providing an alternative to poverty politics, Democrats are no stranger to insisting we need to live within our means.

In Cincinnati, Democratic or Democratic-leaning Charterites have held the mayor’s office for all but two of the last 40 years and Democrats on council have held either an outright majority or plurality for the last 25 years at least. Even so, Cincinnati’s level of poverty still stands at some of the highest in the nation, with child poverty at more than fifty percent. Racial tension has reached a breaking point more than once in this period and race relations in the city, among the most segregated in the nation, never show signs of improving.

The leaders of the Democratic party have been among the most outspoken in favor of tax breaks for companies moving their business to the city, developers doing work in OTR and property owners like Messer who are buying buildings in the neighborhood. These policies make up for the tax breaks and reduced funding by removing resources from much needed social services and social and cultural institutions, expecting the liberal free market to fill in the gaps. This trickle down economics, which fails at every step, forms the core of the modern discussion around fiscal responsibility. Democrats have been champions of policies which, instead of helping the residents in OTR who need it most, banished them from the neighborhood when they were caught up with drugs or as victims of human trafficking. This was, of course, a tactic to further clear the neighborhood and make it ripe for redevelopment. And it was Mayor Cranley who, as a Council member, pushed the Housing Impaction Ordinance, which all but openly declared that those in power don’t want the poor in OTR (though, this was couched as measure to de-concentrate poverty–read: angst–in the inner city after the 2001 uprising). Democrats have been among the most “fiscally responsible”, or “business-friendly” in the vernacular, politicians in the recent history of the city.

Messer’s apparently disenfranchised group are in reality representative of the upper echelons of policy makers in our current system. They are who would rather push for privatization than fund public schools, or who would rather prop up the insurance companies than provide adequate healthcare for all citizens, or who would rather block off roads than provide an economic system that supported poor women instead of driving them to prostitution.

In one way he’s right: there is a need for a new party. But this party should be a party of working people and the people who, even while they shout out, find their voices squelched by the likes of Messer and other economically advantaged people. We need a party that resists false notions of perceived overspending and promotes human need over all else. We need a party that recognizes that it is the working class who constitute the majority and embraces that and fights for working class issues. As long as Messer promotes ideas of “fiscal responsibility,” which have always fallen short of helping working people, this is no party he would ever feel comfortable in. And that’s a good thing.

 

Cross-posted from Dessemundo.com

A shortened version of this will appear in Streetvibes.

Ben Stockwell is an activist from Cincinnati who writes about class, race and social movements.

Upcoming Events (May – June)

Posted on by

We’re just a month into our second year as Cincinnati’s first and only infoshop! We owe the success that we have enjoyed so far to the publishers, local organizations, activists, and community members that have supported us since we started this program last May.

We have a lot planned for the spring/summer this year. The next few months will be a great time to connect with us for anyone that is interested in coming through our lending library, volunteering with us, or attending events and workshops.

Volunteer Orientation & Potluck

sb_bday

Saturday May 24th, 4:00pm-6:00pm

@ SoapBox Books & Zines
(1415 Knowlton Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45223)

fbrsvp RSVP on Facebook

Whether you’ve been with SoapBox from day one, started volunteering recently, or are just interested in learning more and not yet sure if you want to volunteer, join us on May 24th for a SoapBox Potluck & Orientation!

We’ll talk through:
1) A brief history and overview of what SoapBox is;
2) Library procedures (e.g. how do people check books out!?);
3) Logistics, i.e. how does this thing run, and;
4) Where to go from here if you haven’t volunteered with SoapBox and think you might want to do so!

Breakdown of the day:
4-5pm: Potluck – Time to eat, chat, browse books, etc.
5-6pm: Orientation

Since it’s a potluck, please bring a dish to share if you are able to do so. But don’t feel bad and stay home if you don’t have anything to bring though!

Bomani Shakur: ‘CONDEMNED’ Book launch @ SOS ART SHOW

bomani

Friday June 6th & Sunday June 8th

@ Art Academy of Cincinnati
1212 Jackson St, Cincinnati, OH 45202

Our good friend Robert Inhuman is curating a night of musical performances and a documentary screening featuring political prisoner Bomani Shakur as he faces execution on death row.

fbrsvp RSVP on Facebook

Saturday 06/8:

8:30pm Phone call from Keith LaMar AKA Bomani Shakur – literally from DEATH ROW – Bomani is featured in The Shadow of Lucasville (documentary to be show Sun 6/8) and will be reading from his newly published book CONDEMNED as well as discussing a legal battle which has urgent ties to Cincinnati…

SOS music following 9 to 11:30pm FREE all ages!

Preston Charles (modified violin)
Nancy Paraskevopoulos (singer/uke songwriter)
Evolve (reality guerrilla, conscious hip hop)
Decide Today (electronic anarcho-punk)
Nature Was Here (psychedelic ambiance)

+ vid projections, free zines, Realicide distro, more!

~~~~x~~~~x~~~~x~~~~x~~~~x~~~~

Sunday 8 June 2pm:
The Shadow of Lucasville

…as seen with the Insurgent Theatre tour in December, this excellent documentary examines a variety of perspectives on the historic Lucasville prison uprising of 1993 http://www.imdb.com/video/wab/vi2238949145/

Screening begins 2pm with discussion at 3 and SOS exhibit’s closing reception & potluck at 4:30

~~~~x~~~~x~~~~x~~~~x~~~~x~~~~

SOS ART is a massive annual art exhibit with supplementary events surrounding themes of Peace & Justice – SOS 2014 at the Art Academy of Cincinnati opens May 30th and closes June 8thK

How I Quit Capitalism, Going From Libertarian to Socialist

Power To The People

In the past I wrote about how I grew up conservative and was once a member of the libertarian party and how I went from those right wing ideologies to becoming a socialist. For some I hear they got into left wing politics from punk rock music or sub cultures and things of that sort. My evolution came from years in the military and rejecting what I saw as false. This evolution was largely influenced by my reading. I read a great deal. I thought it would be good to write about what I read that influenced my evolution towards the left. Continue reading

Category: Capitalism

The Threat to Chavismo – March 17th

Posted on by

chavismo

Counter-revolutionary business interests have mounted a protest movement against Venezuela’s working class and the socialist reforms that were attained through Hugo Chavez’s Bolivarian Revolution. After Chavez passed away in March of last year, Nicholas Maduro succeeded him as president and the right saw an opportunity to challenge Maduro and Chavismo: Venezuela’s revolutionary project toward a socialist economic and political system.

Susan Spronk, associate professor in the School of International Development and Global Studies at the University of Ottawa will be joining us via Skype for a presentation/discussion on the present threat to Venezuela’s revolutionary socialist project.

Jordan Sears, will then be speaking to what has been attained for Venezuela’s working class through the Bolivarian Revolution and the country’s break away from the West, and State Capitalism.

==================================
5:30pm – Snacks and refreshments

6:00pm – Susan Spronk talk / discussion

7:15pm – Break

7:30pm – Jordan Sears talk / discussion
==================================

Recent analysis on the situation in Venezuela: http://newpol.org/content/february-traumas-third-insurrectionary-moment-venezuelan-right

We will also be streaming the event live from SoapBox below:

Category: Uncategorized

I love Capitalism Because Of All The Good Things It Gave Us

index                Human innovation exists despite capitalism not because of capitalism. The assumption that capitalism makes these innovations and creations is inaccurate. Correlation is not causation.

People claim they love capitalism because of all the innovations and luxuries it has brought them. This is despite the obvious fact that we live in a capitalist system therefore must function within it to meet our basic needs. There is a more problematic element to this joke, the assumption that capitalism makes anything good or innovative happen. As stated above innovation exists despite capitalism not because of capitalism.

Continue reading

Category: Capitalism

University of Cincinnati research study looking for female-identified participants

Posted on by

A friend of Soapbox is conducting this study at UC. If you’re interested in participating, please contact johnjackson113@gmail.com for more info:

Project Mission Statement: With this project we aim to deconstruct masculinity as it is experienced by female-identified bodies. Our analysis will center around how context influences gender expression across normative social constructs. The photographs will serve as playful illustrations of the various means through which our female-identified participants find themselves experiencing their masculinity.

As a team we will be seeking volunteers who identify as female in some fashion, but firm gender identity as female is not required. While we do not intend to exalt the gender binary, our focus is strictly surrounding female-identified individuals on their end of the binary as they relate to a gender expression that is typically reserved for the other end of the spectrum. Our inspiration springs from CJ Pascoe’s chapter on masculine females in “Dude, You’re a Fag.” Pascoe explores two very different groups of girls that each display or claim masculine traits and behaviors—the Basketball Girls and the GSA girls. We have crafted a set of interview questions that will guide our conversations with participants. Through these questions we will do our own exploring around mobility, contextual experience, and public/private perception similar to what Pascoe writes about in her book. Our goal is to appreciate experience, understand how it relates to normative gender expectations, and to celebrate these individuals with accurate representation and a joint effort photography shoot.

A general overview of the discussion we aim to have will be given to participants so they know what to expect, but the ten interview questions will be asked as part of a conversation and not revealed beforehand. Hopefully, there will be many instances where we ask individuals to expand upon their thoughts. We hope this process can be mutually beneficial for our work and those who participate. After the interview a photograph will be taken of the participant that will be created by them and for them based on a final question. The question regarding the photograph will be sent to participants prior to their interview so they may consider their preference.

It is our goal to present holistic portrayals of the masculine females involved by combining conversation with photography. As we gather perspectives and experiences we will let the material guide our outcome. We will recognize and appreciate the varied experiences while paying attention to overlap. Our end result should expand upon the existing discourse regarding the socialized experiences of masculine females.

***NOTE*** All participants will be asked to sign a consent form prior to their interview. They will receive a personal copy and a second one will be kept on file by the interviewers. The consent form does allow any participant to remove themselves from the project at any time, including upon completion of their participation (this includes both interview and photographs), as long as you request it prior to its presentation. Also, consent in the project will include anonymity–all participants will be referred to by pseudonyms and your face is not a required part of the photograph if you wish to exclude it. If you are interested in participating, please email johnjackson113@gmail.com to start that conversation.

Category: Uncategorized

Issues With Redevelopment Issues

Responding to this article in Citybeat, I am a member of The People’s coalition for Equality and Justice (TPCEJ)

A few things:

1476418_10200746236690097_1199025206_n

1) There has been systematic displacement for the last 20 years at least that has included using the police to forcibly evict residents who were paying their rents, landlords increasing rent on residents (who have no substantial protection against such increases), and the use of legislative and policing tactics to exclude residents from the neighborhood (esp. with the drug exclusion ordinance, and housing impaction ordinance). Furthermore, the empty buildings 3CDC is referring to are part of the systematic displacement. Neighborhoods like OTR don’t experience such rapid population decline (1990: 9572, 2000: 7831, 2005-5009: 4677) without external pressures. While 3CDC has only been involved for the last 10 years, they have been responsible for a great deal of displacement in OTR and downtown. An exact number is hard to find, but an investigation would quickly reveal hundreds of people displaced only by the actions of 3CDC. Displacement/depopulation must proceed redevelopment, it is a consistent part of the neoliberal urban process. Only when neighborhoods are sufficiently broken and redevelopers buy property for a dollar, get tax credit for “new markets” and steamroll over existing residents and their concerns.

2) Pointing to crime as a reason 3CDC are doing the redevelopment is misdirection from their actual goal of profits. This article does not mention that 3CDC’s board consists of a few dozen chairpeople, media heads, etc of the some of the largest corporations and nonprofits in the region, including the Enquirer, Scripps, 5/3, P&G and Western & Southern. 3CDC is far from being the catalyst for the reduction of crime. They claim, for example, that they chose the location of their current office because there was a shooting that occurred there and it was near a school. That school was torn down as part of 3CDC’s renovation of Washington Park. Now, they are using the claim that it is dangerous for students at SCPA to learn near the Drop Inn Center as a reason to move the shelter. There was never any issues with the Drop being near Washington Park Elementary or Taft High School prior to the SCPA move. 3CDC and groups like DCI and the OTR Chamber use the police to intimidate residents into submission. The Chamber actually has federal housing dollars redirected towards increased patrols that they get to draw the routes for.

3) The Neighborhood can only have economic diversity (which 3CDC will often say ahead of “racial diversity”) while in flux. Neighborhoods can not exist in a stable state while having residents with competing class interests. This is made plain by what the trends has been for OTR over just the past 10 years: the closing of affordable stores and restaurants with expensive ones opening in their place, the consolidation of RESTOC and OTRHN into OTRCH, the removal of social service agencies like City Gospel Mission (and the accompanying pushback from business owners in Queensgate) and the Drop Inn Center, the attempt to create subsidized housing in Green Township. What this flux creates is a greater disparity: OTR was home to the most income disparate census tract in 2010, but it probably won’t be in 2020 after the gentrification spreads west and north of the Main/Vine corridor, especially when the streetcar is built. When that is the case, incomes will trend toward the higher end throughout the whole neighborhood.

Unless we stop it.

 

Cross-posted from Dessemundo.com

Ben Stockwell is an anti-gentrification activist who writes on issues pertaining to Cincinnati and the world at large.

 

Bluegrass Pipeline Blues

bluegrass_pipeline

The proposal by Williams Company to build a Bluegrass Pipeline that would carry Natural Gas Liquids (NGLs) that come out of the ground during the fracking process in Marcellus and Utica shale areas in Ohio, West Virginia and Pennsylvania places 13 Kentucky counties at direct risk. If we have learned nothing from our dealings with corporate coal companies or by watching numerous YouTube videos of burning water in areas with fracking, then continue considering this an economic opportunity, a way to increase tax revenue and create jobs. That’s exactly what representative of Williams Co. have been telling residents living on the proposed route with the additive of having no need to worry about potential hazards.

PipelineMap

Proposed pipeline route

The jobs are temporary, if they even hire locally which Williams Co. has not committed to publicly. The compensation for “easement agreements” is minimal. As reported by the Kentuckians United to Restrain Eminent Domain (KURE), nearly $8-16 million worth of NGLs will be flowing through the proposed pipeline daily. Yet, Williams is allotting only $30-50 million to all of the landowners combined as a permanent easement. And, the projected annual tax revenue increase sits around $13 million. The economic opportunity lies in very few hands comprising the high-ups of Williams Co. while the potential hazards face the rest of us.

Although Williams Co. has secured some easement agreements in 9 out of the 13 counties, they have stated they will try avoiding use of eminent domain rights while procuring the rest of the landowner signatures. The agreements signed, are between Williams Co. and individual landowners and are not enforceable county-wide. As a private company, their right to use eminent domain has been challenged by KURE in the Franklin Co. Court under Kentucky Revised Statues (KRS) 278.502, KRS 416.675, and KRS 278.470. The NGLs being transported through the pipeline are not for public use, nor public consumption. More importantly the Kentucky Public Service Commission pursuant to KRS Chapter 278 cannot regulate the Bluegrass Pipeline Company LLC as it’s not for public utility.

The Offices of the American Indian Movement of Indiana and Kentucky have called for a halt of the proposed Bluegrass Pipeline. Albert (Kope P’ay Ahn Kooie) Ortiz, Chairman Indiana, and Thomas Pearce, Chairman Kentucky, say they have worked since 1987 to rebury over 1500 of their ancestors and to pass the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act making it a felony to disrupt indigenous graves in Kentucky. In the process of building this pipeline across the state Williams Co. will encounter hundreds if not thousands of burial and other sacred sites. The chairmen declared they will use every legal means necessary to stop further desecration of their sacred sites. They have also asked the state of Kentucky to file charges against the company for the disruption of graves in Hardin County and if the state does not act they will call for emergency action.

The Kentucky Resource Council researched into Williams Co. safety record for those concerned about the 700 waterways the pipeline will stretch through. In 2013 alone, Williams Co. found a leak by accident at a site in Parachute, CO which approximately 10,000 gallons of hydrocarbon liquids contaminated soil and groundwater escaped before being stopped. Williams Natural Gas pipeline in Marshall County, WV ruptured. A compressor station caught fire in Susquehanna County, PA/Branchburg, NJ releasing about 1 ton of methane after that blast. The Williams owned Geismar Plant that processes NGL’s in Louisiana exploded into a fire killing 2 people and injuring 114 more workers while releasing 31,000 pounds of toxins. A subsequent investigation launched at the Geismar Plant revealed 3 years of noncompliance with the Federal Clean Air Act. Back to Parachute, CO, benzene, a known carcinogen, can still be found in increasing amounts in the water.

As the 2014 General Assembly approaches, I urge readers to contact their representatives and senators to encourage strengthening legislation regarding landowner property rights. Rep. Dennis Horlander previously submitted a letter to the editor of the Herald Leader calling for citizens of the commonwealth and colleagues of the General Assembly to unite in a stand against the use or threat of eminent domain. Further, 10 counties of the 13 have passed resolutions opposing the pipeline.

Recommended for your viewing are Josh Fox’s documentaries, Gasland and Gasland II, which follow the horrendous effects that fracking has on land, water, and health. Then ask yourself if you want those hazardous materials traveling through a pipeline beneath thirteen of Kentucky’s counties and rely on Williams Co. safety track record.

Amy grew up in the Bluegrass, graduated from UK with an English degree and went on to proofread for legislators at the Legislative Research Commission. She is currently pursuing an MSW at the University of Maryland-Baltimore and organizing against the construction of the Bluegrass Pipeline.

 

The Parasite of Capitalism

slavelabor            When the state and capitalist have been abolished we will face a dilemma in the United States. The country is a parasite. It is run by capitalists who are parasites on low waged producers and slaves across the globe. Many in the western world are employed as support for the process of building the parasite. The wealth and prosperity the middle class enjoys in the United States is directly attributed to the parasitic nature of capitalism. By abolishing capitalism the stream of wealth we enjoy from our parasitic nature will be ended. For those whose jobs serve the parasitic nature of capitalism in our society it will become necessary for them to learn to create actual wealth by production or serving a function other than the theft of wealth of the global workers.

The parasite nature of capitalism and consumption of inexpensive goods from near slave laborers is invasive. Many local businesses focus on either service or sales of goods derived from this exploitation. A local business often sells products produced outside of the region. Even the locally owned businesses have a hand in the parasitic nature of capitalism. The products consumed and distributed by many local businesses need to be products produced locally. The basic living standard in the western world is in direct conflict with compensating the producer a fair compensation in a capitalist society. Capitalism has created an environment where a pseudo bourgeois middle class thrives at the expense of the worker who produces the luxuries of the middle class.

Living off of the labor of the oppressed is the business model of most large chain stores. The struggle to drive down prices in an attempt to gain more is seen at every Walmart. Products are cheap because the production side is exploitative and immoral. When the capitalists were no longer permitted to own slaves domestically, they simply pushed operations overseas. Workers domestically are often paid the lowest possible wages. All production, sales and maintenance of property are done for the lowest possible while maximizing the profit. Profit is a myth, it is simply the stolen labor through this hierarchical structure of capitalism.

Sadly, much of the left in the U.S. is stuck on capitalism and believes their leftist capitalism can be good. This is one great hindrance when societies ‘liberals’ are that far invested in capitalism and the system of oppression.

At the time of revolution it will become necessary to expropriate and abolish banks and government offices. Property records, deeds and debts will be abolished. All of these are tools to siphon wealth from the working classes and maintain dominion over resources necessary for survival which have been exploited by the capitalist for the purpose of creating disparity and maintaining rule. Those who were once in those positions or employed in the parasitic process of capitalism will find roles in the actual contribution to advancement of society. The freed workers will now find themselves in a dilemma. Production is overseas and necessities and luxuries that were once imported will not be as accessible unless there is global revolution.

With the deporting of factories and production under capitalism we see that many of the things we have come to rely on are in fact produced by slave labor or near slave labor. With a limited regional revolution we will find it necessary to look towards local production. It would benefit us to begin working towards a local economy before the abolition of the state so that we will have access to the means of production that has been lost to capitalism.

pyramid

            The ideal situation is a different story. In the ideal situation we see worldwide revolutionary action by the people throwing off all rulers and authority liberated. This would being absolute freedom from borders that would restrict access to needs. The reality is that if revolution occurs it will most likely be restricted to a specific region or regions. In this the people would face conditions similar to an embargo reliant on what is localized and what has been expropriated by the people. This makes the movement towards local economies more relevant now to begin to set up the conditions necessary for successful revolution. The shift to a local economy should place focus workers shifting from support of the parasitic nature of capitalism towards production.

 

Capitalism thrives on conflict and division between workers. With the great divide between production and consumption we see that our interests tend to shift towards that of the capitalist. In working roles that support the system we find more and more that exploitation is vital to our own survival. Workers in capitalist support roles often have no means of obtaining food or basic goods without turning to the exploitation of the capitalist. If capitalism were to collapse overnight it could lead to disaster. Without a form of organization which struggles to reclaim power for the people we are left without the resources, plan or ability to pick up where the capitalist once ruled. If we abolish the state we fall to the tyranny of capitalism. If we abolish capitalism we fall to the tyranny of the state. In an effort for the people to gain control and implement true socialism it will be vital to create completely new organizations which are controlled by the people not the hierarchies that exist. Many papers and books have been written on the theories of communism, socialism, anarchism, localism, commons, mutualism and more. These theories are almost irrelevant since implementation is not really occurring. Implementation of new structures that function now is vital.

Unions, coops and community organizing is a small step, but alone they are helpless due to their shattered state. Unity has not occurred. Solidarity is kind of a catch phrase and the act of solidarity is not seen. The radical movements are marginalized in the press. They are often caught up in pop culture that can be alienating to the working class which we are seeking to liberate. A plethora of issues rise in social conflict which all serve to keep the workers splintered and subservient to the capitalist. Often the safety found in the support of capitalism is what people cling to. The immediate needs are met therefore they are not interested in upsetting the system. Change can be a threat. Therefore those who are more oppressed and impoverished in the capitalist structure will be the ones who have the most to gain from its abolition. Those who are educated in the theories of liberation are often far removed from the classes which they seek to liberate.

The Spanish Revolution was a moment where anarchists and communists rose up and took control of production and liberated themselves. This was not done by an intellectual elite but by the workers and people themselves. To see where their successes and failures lay can help us on planning our future. Their struggle was not in vain. We can take our lessons and move forward. The first and most important lesson we see is that the working class educated and organized for decades before any success was made. When capitalism is a multinational monstrosity we must look to new tactics to combat the existing system which will adjust our tactics, and we must realize that many of the working class in the western world enjoys the benefits of exploitation through globalization.

There are many outcomes and tactics which can be discussed and used. We could theoretically overthrow the existing system and jump into a revolution. This would be difficult in that we have no unified movement. It is sad that the mainstream of the western world would look to more capitalism and hierarchy to replace the existing system which would lead us back to where we are. This is why our movement must be built in the shell of the existing society.  If we begin a localized movement towards sustainable practices this will be exploited by capitalism. This is already occurring with the local organic movement in our food. The capitalists and state will adjust to maintain their power. They will see these as opportunities to grow and change in their struggle to maintain authority. The effort to change will not be easy and it will involve much more participation.

Category: Uncategorized

Slavoj Zizek Reading Group: “Violence” – Jan. 27th

Posted on by
Zizek_reading_jan27

(click image to visit event page)

We will be hosting a one-time discussion of the book “Violence” by Slavoj Zizek.

6:00pm – 8:00pm
@ SoapBox (1415 Knowlton,45223)
Drinks & snacks provided
Everyone is welcome!
A free PDF copy is available for download here!

“Philosopher, cultural critic, and agent provocateur Slavoj Žižek constructs a fascinating new framework to look at the forces of violence in our world.

Using history, philosophy, books, movies, Lacanian psychiatry, and jokes, Slavoj Žižek examines the ways we perceive and misperceive violence. Drawing from his unique cultural vision, Žižek brings new light to the Paris riots of 2005; he questions the permissiveness of violence in philanthropy; in daring terms, he reflects on the powerful image and determination of contemporary terrorists.

Violence, Žižek states, takes three forms–subjective (crime, terror), objective (racism, hate-speech, discrimination), and systemic (the catastrophic effects of economic and political systems)–and often one form of violence blunts our ability to see the others, raising complicated questions.

Does the advent of capitalism and, indeed, civilization cause more violence than it prevents? Is there violence in the simple idea of “the neighbour”? And could the appropriate form of action against violence today simply be to contemplate, to think?

Beginning with these and other equally contemplative questions, Žižek discusses the inherent violence of globalization, capitalism, fundamentalism, and language, in a work that will confirm his standing as one of our most erudite and incendiary modern thinkers.”

Category: Uncategorized